A- de 2021
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera
✓Claimant Leonardo Reyes Contreras
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
La demanda fue rechazada por el incumplimiento de los requisitos de pertinencia y carga argumentativa.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación corroboró que el demandante no corrigió las falencias argumentativas advertidas en el auto de inadmisión de la demanda y que la providencia de rechazo no incurrió en yerro, olvido o arbitrariedad alguna.
Con base en lo anterior, se CONFIRMÓ en su integridad el auto cuestionado
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto de 24 de marzo de 2021 proferido por el magistrado Antonio Jose Lizarazo Ocampo, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda de la referencia.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
- Tercero. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.